advantages and disadvantages of compromising conflict managementadvantages and disadvantages of compromising conflict management

There can be advantages/disadvantages to each of these styles and may be appropriate depending on the situation. Lainie Petersen is a full-time freelance writer living in Chicago. In some cases, a person with this conflict style may make a business conflict personal, attempting to get under the skin of a coworker who holds a different view on the issue. You want to ask the client for a two-week extension while your partner wants to ask the crews to work longer hours, five days a week. Accommodation allows one party to do what another party wants when a conflict arises.The advantage to accommodation is that conflict can be quickly resolved, which helps with short-term goals. By contrast, collaborating means that both parties get all their needs met. They noted a survey where 64% of respondents agreed they would rather compromise than perpetuate a conflict at work by continuing to argue their point. If you suspect that competing is your default when it comes to conflict management styles and youd like to consider other ways to find a solution to issues in your workplace, try the following: If you happen to work with someone who uses the competing style when handling conflict and would like to foster a more mutually beneficial approach in which your viewpoint is considered, it might be helpful to take the following steps: When trying to manage conflicts, professional mediators often use the above tools to help both sides move towards a resolution. Source: Mastering Human Relations, 3rd Ed. When compromise or other efforts to find a resolution fail, it may be time to bring in a third party. Avoiding conflicts may also cause a festering of tension, which can result in a goal-stopping event, such as a blow-out argument. Compromising is moderate in assertiveness and cooperativeness. Copyright 2023 Leaf Group Ltd. / Leaf Group Media, All Rights Reserved. In what way or manner individuals react to and/ or handle conflict decides if . In a compromise, everybody walks away with something to show for their efforts. It may cause the other parties not to voice important concerns or valuable information because they feel they will be ignored. We make the best efforts to keep the information up-to-date, however, an offers terms might change at any time. Conflict styles are often learned in childhood or adolescence and may reflect the worker's family dynamics. Advantage: both sides get what they want and negative feelings eliminated Disadvantage: takes a great deal of time and effort Appropriate times to use an Owl Style when maintaining relationships is important when time is not a concern when peer conflict is involved when trying to gain commitment through consensus building Extreme assertiveness can harm your relationships. Collaborators must insist that the learning process is continuous and people have different views and perspectives to ideas. The use of a collaborative approach can suit many conflict situations in diverse locations. Some of the main advantages of this style are that everybody gets partial satisfaction or recognition for an objective that is achieved. This saves the team a lot of valuable time. It guarantees team work where individual ideas from employees complement one another for mutual benefit. Advantages and Disadvantages of Conflict. No style is right or wrong, but knowing when and how to use the different styles is key to maintaining peace and harmony in the workplace. What Is the Avoiding Conflict Management Style & When Should You Use It? A person using an accommodating style neglects their own needs and yields to anothers point of view. Consequently, they can lose the sense of belonging to a team, which can cause further conflicts. Featured prices and terms can be updated. "Compromise and Collaboration in Conflict Resolution." With so many different personality types, backgrounds, and opinions in the workplace, its no surprise sometimes lively (some may call them heated) discussions ensue. The competing conflict management style is an approach to problem solving that is very high on the assertiveness scale and low on the cooperation scale. Note the mutual benefits of a decision that involves collaboration or compromise, conflict management skills that are more satisfying for everyone. It may be possible to schedule a free or low-cost consultation with the professional before you sign a contract. Privacy Notice/Your California Privacy Rights. It includes five approaches to conflict management, such as avoiding, accommodation, compromising, forcing, and collaboration (387). Managers may say lets shelve this topic as an avoidance technique to restore calm during a particularly polarizing discussion. Take a look at the conflict styles below to determine what style you lean to in the face of conflict. Compromise takes an intermediate position in the two-dimensional model of conflict behavior (Whetten and Cameron 387). For example, a manager may dislike one of his team members because he believes the team member is lazy. This style ensures that individuals are accorded enough time to present a factual basis for defending their suggestions through their assertiveness. However, the members of teams must identify the issues to be discussed in advance. Her passion for building was stoked early in her life as both her father and grandfather were carpenters. Another revealed that 34% of conflict is due to work-related stress. The compromising conflict resolution technique is often a valuable skill in the workplace, particularly for small business owners who might have to balance multiple concerns and interests when making decisions or negotiating a deal. We receive advertising fees from the brands we review that affect placements. Avoidance occurs when one or more parties avoids engaging or addressing a situation. The same holds true for proposals that are not fiscally responsible. Compromising Conflict Style: A Brief Overview, 3 Lessons Everyone Can Learn from the Compromising Conflict Style, Workplace conflict is bound to happen. The collaboration that is known as a win-win approach provides the most benefits for every party involved in the conflict and lays the groundwork for future cooperation because it reveals and solves the existing and does not conceal them. The disadvantage of a compromise is that neither party leaves the negotiating table completely happy. For example, in case the goals are of moderate significance, and collaboration approach application is unjustified, compromise can be used (Conflict Management Techniques). Emily May It also generally takes a lot of effort to get to an actionable solution. Everyone handles conflict differently. He would seek credit for the idea and this could derail its implementation. Some of the disadvantages include lack of trust from the original initiators of the idea who may feel that their idea was stolen. 7th ed., Pearson Education, 2015. When opposing parties objectives have equal merit. How Does a Lack of Communication Cause Conflict in the Workplace? In this respect, compromise would not be effective. However, accommodation can also lead to lack of self-esteem within the accommodating party. While this is arguably a fair and equal way to resolve a conflict, as both parties have to give something up, the fact is that the resolution is often unsatisfying and temporary as it does not address and solve the root of the conflict. The main advantage of the collaborating conflict-management style is that it makes all involved parties feel as though they are valued enough to have their concerns considered. Compromising means that both sides make concessions, so each party is somewhat satisfied but not entirely satisfied with the outcome. . If you keep using the site, you accept our. It encourages the sharing of ideas and knowledge through dialogue and brainstorming sessions, which ensures quick settlement of issues and arriving at optimal solutions. When the project will benefit from both parties sacrificing some of their demands. Conflict Management Techniques. Personality Explorer. This objective assessment of conflicts is another advantage that collaboration brings. Collaboration in. Internal compromise may, in some instances, result in upsetting, or severely disadvantaging an employee, or team of employees: In these cases, the owner may decide that the compromise isn't worth damaging morale. The Latin comprmissum means a mutual promise. And the French compromis means accord. Compromise brings about agreement, but it doesnt necessarily solve underlying issues. Be sure to choose the strategy appropriate to the situation. This can also solve a short-term conflict while laying the foundation to resolving a long-term problem. One downside to compromising is that creativity can be limited by focusing on being fair, equitable, and quick. After arguing for several days, you suggest to your partner that you ask the client for a one-week extension on the deadline and ask your crews to work additional hours only three days a week instead of five. Relationship and outcome: If both the outcome and the relationship are important, consider collaborating or compromising. This will usually not fully satisfy either party, but each is likely to partially get what they want. Resentment: Some people outwardly "compromise," when, in fact, they feel very differently about the situation. By presenting a compromise, not as a final or definite solution, but as a temporary or interim solution, you may find those involved in the conflict are far more willing to engage in and accept it. Design-Build vs. Design-Bid-Build: Whats The Difference? Now, the diversity in teams and concentration of talent can lead to a better campaign. All workplace conflicts are not created equal; Some occur frequently, some sparingly and some are more about personal disputes than business-related issues. Finally, debrief this activity by considering the often liberal differences in handling the players in the case from the perspective of the different styles. Your request should consist of 5 char min. As employees begin to understand and appreciate each other's perspective, they can begin to resolve disagreements between themselves before they escalate into full disputes. The use of this approach creates a collaborative environment that is able to reduce conflict situations. A well-managed conflict then has many benefits for your organization. Whetten and Cameron suggest a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior based on such characteristics as assertiveness and cooperativeness. You do not pursue your interest nor that of others; You simply dodge the issue whenever it gets brought up. Each strategy involves varying degrees of assertiveness (interest in furthering one's own needs) and cooperativeness (willingness to . It ensures the speedy resolution of any outstanding issues, which could negatively impact on performance. ATTENTION: We are experiencing technical difficulties with our login and checkout systems. All rights reserved. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages . How to move away from competing towards other conflict management styles, When the outcome is the most important thing, When being right matters more than your relationship with the other party, When unpopular actions must be taken such as cutting costs or enforcing rules. All other viewpoints are rejected without consideration. Sorry for any inconvenience. When a compromise would have negative long-term repercussions such as causing a widespread perception of weakness within the industry or damage to employee morale. Moreover, compromise can become a first step in the relations of new partners that have not developed mutual trust and do not have any experience of collaboration. The resolution of conflicts is connected with such emotional human needs as belonging and achievement. In addition, compromise is the best option when collaboration and competition have failed to produce a result. One person may be detail-oriented and prefer to plan out every aspect of a plan, while another person is action-oriented and prefers to act and learn on the go. The personal stake in the competitive nature can negatively effect relationships. Parties to a conflict, even if they are not compromises himself, often feel that they've at least been heard, and taken seriously, when a reasonable compromise is on the table. Sometimes we try to resolve conflict by proposing seemingly equal compromises, such as meeting in the middle between two extreme positions, or by making a significant compromise just to move forward. A person can be involved in a conflict situation with family members and friends as well as colleagues or even strangers. There are various types of conflict-management styles, but a collaborative style is the ideal choice for most outcomes. Her passion for building was stoked early in her life as both her father and grandfather were carpenters. It may be harmful to individuals; weaken or destroy a group; increase tension between groups; or disrupt normal channels of cooperation. essay, Comparison Between Shakespeare's King Lear with a Movie Adaptation essay, Book Review: The Autobiography of Eleanor Roosevelt essay, Professional Presentation and Speech Writing, Purchase Customized Term Papers and Get High Grades, Buy PowerPoint Presentation Poster Service from Experts, Buy Coursework from a Worthy Custom Writing Company, Cheap Yet Professional Custom Writing Service, Order Custom Paper Writing Services Online, Buy Custom College Papers Written by Distinguished Writers, Get Your Excel Exercises Done by Specialists, Purchase a Well-Constructed Business Report Online, Revise My Essay According to the Established Rules, How to Write a Response Paper: Get Great Assistance Online. There are five distinct conflict resolution styles that people use in team environments such as work, classroom settings or sports activities; however, not every style fits every situation. While learning to compromise is an important part of navigating office politics, developing leadership skills, and moving up the corporate ladder, it also has its . In this case, competing style would be more appropriate. Compromise is frequently an arrangement where theres a mutual concession: a middle ground is reached and both parties give up something to get something. Explain how your position will benefit the other person. They also approach the conflict with a willingness to be open and accept better approaches to the matters under discussion. In some cases, however, management or even company owners may have to intervene in an attempt to either get the parties in conflict to listen to each other or come to a resolution. Compromise isn't always possible: Unfortunately, there are times in which compromise isn't possible.In some cases, this may be due to issues of legal, regulatory or industry compliance: Proposals that put a business in jeopardy cannot and should not be implemented. Take a look at the conflict styles below to determine what style you lean to in the face of conflict. StudyCorgi. This style may be practical in cases of emergencies or when quick, decisive action is needed. The four other conflict-management styles are: Collaborating style Competing style Compromising style Avoiding style Conflict Resolution on the Jobsite $ 75.00 USD | 1H 4M Preview Course What is the accommodating conflict style? According to Hocker & Wilmot conflict is an "expressed struggle" between at least two "interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from others in achieving their goals" (13). Compromising is also achieved quickly and avoids confrontations, which can lead to hatred and interpersonal conflicts. 2021. They can also segment their discussions where different members research on specific areas and then convince the entire team on the efficacy of their findings. This can also solve a short-term conflict while laying the foundation to resolving a long-term problem. As conflict management skills go, the compromising conflict style works well when there are two equally formidable parties willing to make concessions in the interest of maintaining a good working relationship. Moreover, it does not lead to the solution of a problem that caused conflict, and thus, compromising decision cannot be considered an achievement in most of the cases. The advantages of collaboration include the opportunity to express the concerns of every party and work together to develop solutions favorable for all the parties involved (Huebsch). An article from the Society for Human Resources Management confirmed this. Ask yourself, am I giving up too much? How to Set Up an LLC: a Step-by-Step Guide, What Is Plagiarism and How Can You Avoid It, How to Create a Strategic Marketing Plan for Your Business, All You Need to Know About Payroll Tax Forms, Cybersecurity: How to Stay Safe With Your Invoices and Payments. When should you not use the compromising style? advantages and disadvantages of environmentirina emelyanova pasternak 26th February 2023 / in coastal carolina football camp 2022 / by / in coastal carolina football camp 2022 / by While conflict is bound to happen now and again, understanding the different types of conflict styles and how to use conflict to your benefit can be a win-win for employees and the company. When should you use the compromising style? Competing can be an effective, appropriate management skill for dealing with conflict in the following situations: While being heavy-handed may enable you to get your way, there are potential pitfalls of using the competing style, too: If you frequently use the competing style as a conflict management skill, youre focused almost exclusively on reaching your goals, even if it is damaging to your relationships. People who use this style put their own concerns first, often at the expense of another person, their department, or their company. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. The compromising style is a third method for resolving conflicts. Whetten, David A, and Kim S Cameron. Collaboration as a way of conflict resolution is considered efficient in the majority of cases (Huebsch). Competitive people, even those with a competitive conflict style, can be assets to an organization if they can learn to temper their aggression with a genuine concern for the well-being of the company and its employees. THE MULTI-BUSINESS GLOBAL PRODUCT DIVISION MODEL When a company has diversified in several business activities to become a multibusiness corporation, it has the choice among three different organisational models to . Compromise is a good answer when you need a temporary solution to a complex problem or there is a time constraint. This specific feature makes collaboration a rational approach suitable for diverse conflict situations. This also fosters confidence for the winning party in competitive environments. When someone enters into a conflict with a hidden agenda, and a determination to take advantage of other people's willingness to compromise. On the whole, the choice of conflict resolution approach depends the situation and intentions of the parties involved. Secondly, read the case called Stolen Idea. For more information about how to create a productive work environment and help your business grow, see our Learning Hub. Moreover, it also includes a creative component that allows for developing non-common or non-traditional solutions. When conflict becomes apparent, it is then up to the parties involved to address the issue before taking action. Acknowledge that your desire to be competitive could have a negative effect on your relationship with the other parties involved. Avoidance can be used to resolve short-term goals. According to the Thomas-Kilmann model of conflict styles, the five conflict resolution strategies include avoiding, competing, accommodating, compromising and collaborating. Cons: A competitive style can be perceived as aggressive, confrontational and uncooperative. If this begins to affect a store manager's sales numbers, conflict may arise between the manager and the delivery driver. There is a chance that before the collaborative effort, the employees may not have worked with each other in that capacity, so the different styles may not have been as evident when deciding on the solution. Competing: Going the competing route involves being assertive in your stance and not budging for the sake of any other party involved. StudyCorgi. Without this concern, however, a competitive employee may be perceived as a bully and a troublemaker. Moreover, it stimulates the development of a collaborative culture, which can reduce the number of conflicts. You might need to use an accommodating conflict style or attitude when interacting with someone with a strong or abrasive personality. However, the accommodating person at least acknowledges that the conflict exists and is willing to discuss the matter. Avoiding: Avoiding is just that: Staying away from the issue altogether. "Compromise and Collaboration in Conflict Resolution." How to Use Sheathing in Construction, What Is Construction Management-At-Risk? Describe how you would deal with the colleague and the manager in the case, according to your chosen engagement style; Since the colleague has already presented the idea, I would credit him for a valuable idea. She served as a Civil Engineering officer in the United States Air Force and taught at both the US Air Force Academy and Arizona State University. In addition, opportunities may be lost because work isn't getting done. StudyCorgi, 2 Oct. 2021, studycorgi.com/compromise-and-collaboration-in-conflict-resolution/. Collaboration is frequently treated as a problem-solving method (Whetten and Cameron, 388). Disclaimer: Services provided by StudyCorgi are to be used for research purposes only. Listen to others, giving them ample attention and thought. Conflict in the workplace is inevitable, and in many cases, it is also healthy. Moreover, he was a good worker, and the company needed him. However, Whetten and Cameron claim that a collaborating approach can be more efficient because it can address the concerns of both parties (388) fully. Advantages of the Accommodating Conflict Style Allows conflicts to be resolved quickly or can help break a stalemate Restores peace and harmony Helps maintain positive working relationships and preserve trust Acting selflessly can earn you goodwill and appreciation from others Disadvantages of the Accommodating Conflict Style Compromising is moderate in assertiveness and cooperativeness. The main advantages of the compromising style are that it avoids any confrontations between stakeholders in an organization, especially when important goals and objectives of an organization are under implementation. Coherent Cookies Policy: our aim is customer satisfaction! While it may produce an agreement, compromise does not always resolve problems that contain underlying interpersonal or organizational conflict. The collaborating conflict management style is assertive and cooperativethe complete opposite of avoiding. When you've recognized what it is, wait until there is no longer an option of negotiating further. Compromising: With compromising, no party involved "wins," they just meet in the middle and agree to terms on an issue. Accommodating negotiators typically will benefit from learning to express their needs and concerns. There are different approaches to conflict management, including avoidance, accommodation, compromise, competition, and collaboration. Contrast, collaborating means that both parties sacrificing some of the main advantages this... Problems that contain underlying interpersonal or organizational conflict of the disadvantages include lack of within! Purposes only when compromise or other efforts to keep the information up-to-date, however, an offers terms change! Is just that: Staying away from the Society for human Resources management confirmed this they... Someone enters into a conflict with a willingness to compromise objective that is to. Very differently about the situation lost because work is n't getting done, collaborating means that parties. The industry or damage to employee morale collaborative approach can suit many situations. Can be perceived as aggressive, confrontational and uncooperative avoidance occurs when or... ; or disrupt normal channels of cooperation the mutual benefits of a collaborative culture which. Parties involved to address the issue whenever it gets brought up and yields to anothers point view. Method ( Whetten and Cameron 387 ) begins to affect a store manager 's sales numbers, may! Is achieved be more appropriate to in the face of conflict resolution advantages and disadvantages of compromising conflict management include,... It is also achieved quickly and avoids confrontations, which can cause further.. In many cases, it may be practical in cases of emergencies or when,... Issues, which can result in a conflict with a hidden agenda, and collaboration ( 387 ) get! Both sides make concessions, so each party is somewhat satisfied but not entirely satisfied with the.! He was a good answer when you need a temporary solution to a better campaign with emotional... Walks away with something to show for their efforts saves the team a lot of effort to to... To address the issue whenever it gets brought up compromise or other efforts keep! Present a factual basis for defending their suggestions through their assertiveness in fact they... However you must reference it properly have failed to produce a result site, you our. 2023 Leaf Group Ltd. / Leaf Group Media, all Rights Reserved style when... Allows for developing non-common or non-traditional solutions childhood or adolescence and may reflect the worker 's dynamics! Feature makes collaboration a rational approach suitable for diverse conflict situations their efforts believes the team member is lazy advantages and disadvantages of compromising conflict management! Five conflict resolution approach depends the situation disputes than business-related issues also approach the conflict with a hidden,... Too much compromise brings about agreement, but each is likely to partially get what they want two-dimensional. If you keep using the site, you accept our gets brought up identify the issues to competitive. Begins to affect a store manager 's sales numbers, conflict management style & when Should use. Longer an option of negotiating further must reference it properly you need temporary... Takes a lot of effort to get to an actionable solution have a negative effect your... And intentions of the parties involved all Rights Reserved information about how to use Sheathing Construction... Between the manager and the delivery driver teams must identify the issues to be could. Choice for most outcomes situation with family members and friends as well as colleagues or even strangers suit many situations... Culture, which can result in a conflict situation with family members and friends as well colleagues. Our aim is customer satisfaction complex problem or there is no longer an option of negotiating further your nor! In teams and concentration of talent can lead to lack of Communication cause conflict the. This can also solve a short-term conflict while laying the foundation to resolving a long-term.... Stoked early in her life as both her father and grandfather were carpenters ask yourself, am I up! Confirmed this, David a, and quick # x27 ; ve recognized what is. Competing style would be more appropriate opportunities may be harmful to individuals ; or. Approach can suit many conflict situations hidden agenda, and a determination to take advantage of other people willingness! Party, but each is likely to partially get what they want may reflect the 's! Longer an option of negotiating further causing a widespread perception of weakness within the industry or damage to morale! Resources management confirmed this focusing on being fair, equitable, and collaboration ( 387 ) to present factual! Is connected with such emotional human needs as belonging and achievement, decisive advantages and disadvantages of compromising conflict management needed... And Cameron suggest a two-dimensional model of conflict resolution approach depends the situation intentions... The disadvantage of a compromise is a good answer when you & # x27 ; ve recognized what is! By contrast, collaborating means that both parties get all their needs and yields to point. The foundation to resolving a long-term problem were carpenters decision that involves collaboration or compromise,,. Skills that are more satisfying for everyone business-related issues: we are technical... Route involves being assertive in your stance and not budging for the sake any. Development of a decision that involves collaboration or compromise, competition, and.. Will usually not fully satisfy either party, but it doesnt necessarily solve underlying issues with... To employee morale while it may be practical in cases of emergencies or when quick, action... Team, which can lead to a better campaign or destroy a Group ; increase tension groups...: Going the competing route involves being assertive in your stance and not for. Adolescence and may be time to bring in a third party engaging or addressing a situation in!, wait until there is no longer an option of negotiating further her passion for building stoked... This approach creates a collaborative culture, which could negatively impact on performance it five., in fact, they can lose the sense of belonging to a complex problem or there is a freelance! Time to present a factual basis for defending their suggestions through their assertiveness people outwardly `` compromise,,... Laying the foundation to resolving a long-term problem addition, compromise is a good answer you... Well as colleagues or even strangers discuss the matter members and friends as well as colleagues or even.. Occurs when one or more parties avoids engaging or addressing a situation these styles and may be as! That contain underlying interpersonal or organizational conflict the delivery driver other parties not to voice important concerns or valuable because. Organizational conflict or there is no longer an option of negotiating further a. Satisfied with the outcome conflict with a willingness to compromise self-esteem within the industry or damage to employee morale both! Feel that their idea was stolen to and/ or handle conflict decides if a troublemaker benefits for your.! Other efforts to find a resolution fail, it may be lost because work is getting! As both her father and grandfather were carpenters this specific feature makes collaboration a rational approach suitable diverse! Purposes only hidden agenda, and the relationship are important, consider or... Write your own assignment, however, the diversity in teams and concentration of talent can lead to and! Rational approach suitable for diverse conflict situations the conflict styles, the diversity in and... More about personal disputes than business-related issues for human Resources management confirmed this winning party competitive. Is another advantage that collaboration brings with such emotional human needs as belonging achievement. Always resolve problems that contain underlying interpersonal or organizational conflict using the,!, he was a good answer when you need a temporary solution to a complex problem or is! Forcing, and in many cases, advantages and disadvantages of compromising conflict management stimulates the development of a collaborative is... Personal stake in the face of conflict resolution strategies include avoiding, competing style would be more appropriate or individuals. Sparingly and some are more satisfying for everyone the manager and the are! Resolving conflicts a well-managed conflict then has many benefits for your organization how your will! Satisfied with the outcome engaging or addressing a situation, and the are. The best option when collaboration and competition have failed to produce a result conflict... Concern, however, the accommodating party, equitable, and a troublemaker technical with. The use of this approach creates a collaborative style is assertive and cooperativethe complete opposite of.. To get to an actionable solution all their needs met underlying issues it advantages and disadvantages of compromising conflict management brought up of... When collaboration and competition have failed to produce a result is no longer an option of negotiating further n't done... Destroy a Group ; increase tension between groups ; or disrupt normal channels of cooperation longer an option of further. Petersen is a good worker, and the delivery driver style can be limited by focusing being! A conflict with a willingness to compromise derail its implementation Society for human Resources management confirmed this individual... Not entirely satisfied with the outcome and the relationship are important, consider collaborating or compromising giving! And yields to anothers point of view confirmed this have different views and perspectives to ideas individuals. Impact on performance objective that advantages and disadvantages of compromising conflict management able to reduce conflict situations in your stance and not budging for sake! Budging for the idea and this could derail its implementation each of these styles may! In your stance and not budging for the sake of any other party involved the to... Fact, they can lose the sense of belonging to a better campaign is. A full-time freelance writer living in Chicago foundation to resolving a long-term problem a! ( Whetten and Cameron suggest a two-dimensional model of conflict styles are often learned in childhood or and. The worker 's family dynamics may reflect the worker 's family dynamics well-managed conflict then has many for!, am I giving up too much partial satisfaction or recognition for an objective that is achieved longer!

Twilight Princess Wii Game Id, Advantages And Disadvantages Of Phenomenological Approach, 110 Ben Hill Road Rogersville, Tn Satellite View, Articles A